I was fortunate enough to stumble upon different trainings, roughly in the same span of five to ten years, which would eventually be the building blocks for The Anxious Personality Framework. The first was Nonviolent Communication, a framework created by Marshal Rosenberg that’s centered on non-judgment and the concept that judgment stems from tragically unmet needs. The training I received in Nonviolent Communication showed me that the feeling of anxiety could be tied to a deeply unmet need for something universal and essential in us.
The second was the Enneagram system, which has become mainstream in popular culture, especially in leadership development circles. But it was the teachings of Russ Hudson and Sandra Maitri, pioneers within the Enneagram space, that helped me to understand the distinction between the “fixed, limited personality” and “our true nature.”
The third was The Diamond Approach, a modern spiritual approach that combined psychological and spiritual understanding to realize our true nature. A.H. Almaas, the founder of The Diamond Approach, put forward the “theory of holes” in his teaching, which is a major foundational principle for The Anxious Personality Framework. In short, the theory of holes states that the ego personality develops from a disconnection from an essential part of our true selves, and this disconnection is the primary source of our suffering, which can take the form of anger, despair, envy, hatred, fear, and of course, anxiety.
As a student of The Diamond Approach, I learned a great deal about ego development and what makes up the “ego structure,” or what is widely known as the fixed personality. The personality is how we generally know ourselves. It’s what gives you a sense of self, a sense of “you” versus “me.” While most of us walk around assuming we are the personality, I discovered through my training that the personality is not much more than the sum of the programming and conditioning that we’ve internalized in our life.